--- name: "fi_peer" section: "3" platform: "linux" package: "libfabric" version: "2.7.0-1" release: "Arch Linux 2026-11-01" platforms: ["linux"] url: "https://new.carta.tech/fi_peer" --- # fi\_peer(3) ## NAME - fi\_export\_fid / fi\_import\_fid Share a fabric object between different providers or resources - struct fid\_peer\_av An address vector sharable between independent providers - struct fid\_peer\_av\_set An AV set sharable between independent providers - struct fid\_peer\_cq A completion queue that may be shared between independent providers - struct fid\_peer\_cntr A counter that may be shared between independent providers - struct fid\_peer\_srx A shared receive context that may be shared between independent providers ## SYNOPSIS - ``` #include #include #include int fi_export_fid(struct fid *fid, uint64_t flags, struct fid **expfid, void *context); int fi_import_fid(struct fid *fid, struct fid *expfid, uint64_t flags); ``` ## ARGUMENTS - *fid* Returned fabric identifier for opened object. - *expfid* Exported fabric object that may be shared with another provider. - *flags* Control flags for the operation. - \*context: User defined context that will be associated with a fabric object. ## DESCRIPTION NOTICE: The peer APIs describe by this man page are developmental and may change between libfabric versions. The data structures and API definitions should not be considered stable between versions. Providers being used as peers must target the same libfabric version. Functions defined in this man page are typically used by providers to communicate with other providers, known as peer providers, or by other libraries to communicate with the libfabric core, known as peer libraries. Most middleware and applications should not need to access this functionality, as the documentation mainly targets provider developers. Peer providers are a way for independently developed providers to be used together in a tight fashion, such that layering overhead and duplicate provider functionality can be avoided. Peer providers are linked by having one provider export specific functionality to another. This is done by having one provider export a sharable fabric object (fid), which is imported by one or more peer providers. As an example, a provider which uses TCP to communicate with remote peers may wish to use the shared memory provider to communicate with local peers. To remove layering overhead, the TCP based provider may export its completion queue and shared receive context and import those into the shared memory provider. The general mechanisms used to share fabric objects between peer providers are similar, independent from the object being shared. However, because the goal of using peer providers is to avoid overhead, providers must be explicitly written to support the peer provider mechanisms. When importing any shared fabric object into a peer, the owner will create a separate fid\_peer\_\* for each peer provider it intends to import into. The owner will pass this unique fid\_peer\_\* into each peer through the context parameter of the init call for the resource (i.e. fi\_cq\_open, fi\_srx\_context, fi\_cntr\_open, etc). The fi\_peer\_context will indicate the owner-allocated fid\_peer for the peer to use but is temporary for the init call and may not be accessed by the peer after initialization. The peer will set just the peer\_ops of the owner-allocated fid and save a reference to the imported fid\_peer\_\* for use in the peer API flow. The peer will allocate its own fid for internal uses and return that fid to the owner through the regular fid parameter of the init call (as if it were just another opened resource). The owner is responsible for saving the returned peer fid from the open call in order to close it later (or to drive progress in the case of the cq\_fid). There are two peer provider models. In the example listed above, both peers are full providers in their own right and usable in a stand-alone fashion. In a second model, one of the peers is known as an offload provider. An offload provider implements a subset of the libfabric API and targets the use of specific acceleration hardware. For example, network switches may support collective operations, such as barrier or broadcast. An offload provider may be written specifically to leverage this capability; however, such a provider is not usable for general purposes. As a result, an offload provider is paired with a main peer provider. ## PEER AV The peer AV allows the sharing of addressing metadata between providers. It specifically targets the use case of having a main provider paired with an offload provider, where the offload provider leverages the communication that has already been established through the main provider. In other situations, such as that mentioned above pairing a tcp provider with a shared memory provider, each peer will likely have their own AV that is not shared. The setup for a peer AV is similar to the setup for a shared CQ, described below. The owner of the AV creates a fid\_peer\_av object that links back to its actual fid\_av. The fid\_peer\_av is then imported by the offload provider. Peer AVs are configured by the owner calling the peer’s fi\_av\_open() call, passing in the FI\_PEER flag, and pointing the context parameter to struct fi\_peer\_av\_context. The data structures to support peer AVs are: - ``` struct fid_peer_av; struct fi_ops_av_owner { size_t size; int (*query)(struct fid_peer_av *av, struct fi_av_attr *attr); fi_addr_t (*ep_addr)(struct fid_peer_av *av, struct fid_ep *ep); }; struct fid_peer_av { struct fid fid; struct fi_ops_av_owner *owner_ops; }; struct fi_peer_av_context { size_t size; struct fid_peer_av *av; }; ``` ### fi\_ops\_av\_owner::query() This call returns current attributes for the peer AV. The owner sets the fields of the input struct fi\_av\_attr based on the current state of the AV for return to the caller. ### fi\_ops\_av\_owner::ep\_addr() This lookup function returns the fi\_addr of the address associated with the given local endpoint. If the address of the local endpoint has not been inserted into the AV, the function should return FI\_ADDR\_NOTAVAIL. ## PEER AV SET The peer AV set allows the sharing of collective addressing data between providers. It specifically targets the use case pairing a main provider with a collective offload provider. The setup for a peer AV set is similar to a shared CQ, described below. The owner of the AV set creates a fid\_peer\_av\_set object that links back to its fid\_av\_set. The fid\_peer\_av\_set is imported by the offload provider. Peer AV sets are configured by the owner calling the peer’s fi\_av\_set\_open() call, passing in the FI\_PEER\_AV flag, and pointing the context parameter to struct fi\_peer\_av\_set\_context. The data structures to support peer AV sets are: - ``` struct fi_ops_av_set_owner { size_t size; int (*members)(struct fid_peer_av_set *av, fi_addr_t *addr, size_t *count); }; struct fid_peer_av_set { struct fid fid; struct fi_ops_av_set_owner *owner_ops; }; struct fi_peer_av_set_context { size_t size; struct fi_peer_av_set *av_set; }; ``` ### fi\_ops\_peer\_av\_owner::members This call returns an array of AV addresses that are members of the AV set. The size of the array is specified through the count parameter. On return, count is set to the number of addresses in the AV set. If the input count value is too small, the function returns -FI\_ETOOSMALL. Otherwise, the function returns an array of fi\_addr values. ## PEER CQ The peer CQ defines a mechanism by which a peer provider may insert completions into the CQ owned by another provider. This avoids the overhead of the libfabric user needing to access multiple CQs. To setup a peer CQ, a provider creates a fid\_peer\_cq object, which links back to the provider’s actual fid\_cq. The fid\_peer\_cq object is then imported by a peer provider. The fid\_peer\_cq defines callbacks that the providers use to communicate with each other. The provider that allocates the fid\_peer\_cq is known as the owner, with the other provider referred to as the peer. An owner may setup peer relationships with multiple providers. Peer CQs are configured by the owner calling the peer’s fi\_cq\_open() call. The owner passes in the FI\_PEER flag to fi\_cq\_open(). When FI\_PEER is specified, the context parameter passed into fi\_cq\_open() must reference a struct fi\_peer\_cq\_context. Providers that do not support peer CQs must fail the fi\_cq\_open() call with -FI\_EINVAL (indicating an invalid flag). The fid\_peer\_cq referenced by struct fi\_peer\_cq\_context must remain valid until the peer’s CQ is closed. The data structures to support peer CQs are defined as follows: - ``` struct fi_ops_cq_owner { size_t size; ssize_t (*write)(struct fid_peer_cq *cq, void *context, uint64_t flags, size_t len, void *buf, uint64_t data, uint64_t tag, fi_addr_t src); ssize_t (*writeerr)(struct fid_peer_cq *cq, const struct fi_cq_err_entry *err_entry); }; struct fid_peer_cq { struct fid fid; struct fi_ops_cq_owner *owner_ops; }; struct fi_peer_cq_context { size_t size; struct fid_peer_cq *cq; }; ``` For struct fid\_peer\_cq, the owner initializes the fid and owner\_ops fields. struct fi\_ops\_cq\_owner is used by the peer to communicate with the owning provider. If manual progress is needed on the peer CQ, the owner should drive progress by using the fi\_cq\_read() function with the buf parameter set to NULL and count equal 0. The peer provider should set other functions that attempt to read the peer’s CQ (i.e. fi\_cq\_readerr, fi\_cq\_sread, etc.) to return -FI\_ENOSYS. ### fi\_ops\_cq\_owner::write() This call directs the owner to insert new completions into the CQ. The fi\_cq\_attr::format field, along with other related attributes, determines which input parameters are valid. Parameters that are not reported as part of a completion are ignored by the owner, and should be set to 0, NULL, or other appropriate value by the user. For example, if source addressing is not returned with a completion, then the src parameter should be set to FI\_ADDR\_NOTAVAIL and ignored on input. The owner is responsible for locking, event signaling, and handling CQ overflow. Data passed through the write callback is relative to the user. For example, the fi\_addr\_t is relative to the peer’s AV. The owner is responsible for converting the address if source addressing is needed. (TBD: should CQ overflow push back to the user for flow control? Do we need backoff / resume callbacks in ops\_cq\_user?) ### fi\_ops\_cq\_owner::writeerr() The behavior of this call is similar to the write() ops. It inserts a completion indicating that a data transfer has failed into the CQ. ### EXAMPLE PEER CQ SETUP The above description defines the generic mechanism for sharing CQs between providers. This section outlines one possible implementation to demonstrate the use of the APIs. In the example, provider A uses provider B as a peer for data transfers targeting endpoints on the local node. - ``` 1. Provider A is configured to use provider B as a peer. This may be coded into provider A or set through an environment variable. 2. The application calls: fi_cq_open(domain_a, attr, &cq_a, app_context) 3. Provider A allocates cq_a and automatically configures it to be used as a peer cq. 4. Provider A takes these steps: allocate peer_cq and reference cq_a set peer_cq_context->cq = peer_cq set attr_b.flags |= FI_PEER fi_cq_open(domain_b, attr_b, &cq_b, peer_cq_context) 5. Provider B allocates a cq, but configures it such that all completions are written to the peer_cq. The cq ops to read from the cq are set to enosys calls. 6. Provider B inserts its own callbacks into the peer_cq object. It creates a reference between the peer_cq object and its own cq. ``` ## PEER COUNTER The peer counter defines a mechanism by which a peer provider may increment value or error into the counter owned by another provider. The setup of a peer counter is similar to the setup for a peer CQ outlined above. The owner’s counter object is imported directly into the peer. The data structures to support peer counters are defined as follows: - ``` struct fi_ops_cntr_owner { size_t size; void (*inc)(struct fid_peer_cntr *cntr); void (*incerr)(struct fid_peer_cntr *cntr); }; struct fid_peer_cntr { struct fid fid; struct fi_ops_cntr_owner *owner_ops; }; struct fi_peer_cntr_context { size_t size; struct fid_peer_cntr *cntr; }; ``` Similar to the peer CQ, if manual progress is needed on the peer counter, the owner should drive progress by using the fi\_cntr\_read() and the fi\_cntr\_read() should do nothing but progress the peer cntr. The peer provider should set other functions that attempt to access the peer’s cntr (i.e. fi\_cntr\_readerr, fi\_cntr\_set, etc.) to return -FI\_ENOSYS. ### fi\_ops\_cntr\_owner::inc() This call directs the owner to increment the value of the cntr. ### fi\_ops\_cntr\_owner::incerr() The behavior of this call is similar to the inc() ops. It increments the error of the cntr indicating that a data transfer has failed into the cntr. ## PEER DOMAIN The peer domain allows a provider to access the operations of a domain object of its peer. For example, an offload provider can use a peer domain to register memory buffers with the main provider. The setup of a peer domain is similar to the setup for a peer CQ outline above. The owner’s domain object is imported directly into the peer. Peer domains are configured by the owner calling the peer’s fi\_domain2() call. The owner passes in the FI\_PEER flag to fi\_domain2(). When FI\_PEER is specified, the context parameter passed into fi\_domain2() must reference a struct fi\_peer\_domain\_context. Providers that do not support peer domains must fail the fi\_domain2() call with -FI\_EINVAL. The fid\_domain referenced by struct fi\_peer\_domain\_context must remain valid until the peer’s domain is closed. The data structures to support peer domains are defined as follows: - ``` struct fi_peer_domain_context { size_t size; struct fid_domain *domain; }; ``` ## PEER EQ The peer EQ defines a mechanism by which a peer provider may insert events into the EQ owned by another provider. This avoids the overhead of the libfabric user needing to access multiple EQs. The setup of a peer EQ is similar to the setup for a peer CQ outline above. The owner’s EQ object is imported directly into the peer provider. Peer EQs are configured by the owner calling the peer’s fi\_eq\_open() call. The owner passes in the FI\_PEER flag to fi\_eq\_open(). When FI\_PEER is specified, the context parameter passed into fi\_eq\_open() must reference a struct fi\_peer\_eq\_context. Providers that do not support peer EQs must fail the fi\_eq\_open() call with -FI\_EINVAL (indicating an invalid flag). The fid\_eq referenced by struct fi\_peer\_eq\_context must remain valid until the peer’s EQ is closed. The data structures to support peer EQs are defined as follows: - ``` struct fi_peer_eq_context { size_t size; struct fid_eq *eq; }; ``` ## PEER SRX The peer SRX defines a mechanism by which peer providers may share a common shared receive context. This avoids the overhead of having separate receive queues, can eliminate memory copies, and ensures correct application level message ordering. The setup of a peer SRX is similar to the setup for a peer CQ outlined above. A fid\_peer\_srx object links the owner of the SRX with the peer provider. Peer SRXs are configured by the owner calling the peer’s fi\_srx\_context() call with the FI\_PEER flag set. The context parameter passed to fi\_srx\_context() must be a struct fi\_peer\_srx\_context. The owner provider initializes all elements of the fid\_peer\_srx and referenced structures (fi\_ops\_srx\_owner and fi\_ops\_srx\_peer), with the exception of the fi\_ops\_srx\_peer callback functions. Those must be initialized by the peer provider prior to returning from the fi\_srx\_contex() call and are used by the owner to control peer actions. The data structures to support peer SRXs are defined as follows: - ``` struct fid_peer_srx; struct fi_peer_rx_entry { struct fi_peer_srx *srx; fi_addr_t addr; size_t msg_size; uint64_t tag; uint64_t cq_data; uint64_t flags; void *context; size_t count; void **desc; void *peer_context; void *owner_context; struct iovec *iov; }; struct fi_peer_match_attr { fi_addr_t addr; size_t msg_size; uint64_t tag; }; struct fi_ops_srx_owner { size_t size; int (*get_msg)(struct fid_peer_srx *srx, struct fi_peer_match_attr *attr, struct fi_peer_rx_entry **entry); int (*get_tag)(struct fid_peer_srx *srx, struct fi_peer_match_attr *attr, uint64_t tag, struct fi_peer_rx_entry **entry); int (*queue_msg)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); int (*queue_tag)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); void (*foreach_unspec_addr)(struct fid_peer_srx *srx, fi_addr_t (*get_addr)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *)); void (*free_entry)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); }; struct fi_ops_srx_peer { size_t size; int (*start_msg)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); int (*start_tag)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); int (*discard_msg)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); int (*discard_tag)(struct fi_peer_rx_entry *entry); }; struct fid_peer_srx { struct fid_ep ep_fid; struct fi_ops_srx_owner *owner_ops; struct fi_ops_srx_peer *peer_ops; }; struct fi_peer_srx_context { size_t size; struct fid_peer_srx *srx; }; ``` The ownership of structure field values and callback functions is similar to those defined for peer CQs, relative to owner versus peer ops. The owner is responsible for acquiring any necessary locks before anything that could result in peer callbacks. The following functions are progress level functions: get\_msg(), get\_tag(), queue\_msg(), queue\_tag(), free\_entry(), start\_msg(), start\_tag(), discard\_msg(), discard\_tag(). If needed, it is the owner’s responsibility to acquire the appropriate lock prior to calling into a peer’s fi\_cq\_read(), or similar, function that drives progress. The following functions are domain level functions: foreach\_unspec\_addr(). This function is used outside of message progress flow (i.e. during fi\_av\_insert()). The owner of the srx is responsible for acquiring the same lock, if needed. ### fi\_peer\_rx\_entry fi\_peer\_rx\_entry defines a common receive entry for use between the owner and peer. The entry is allocated and set by the owner and passed between owner and peer to communicate details of the application-posted receive entry. All fields are initialized by the owner, except in the unexpected message case where the peer can initialize any extra available data before queuing the message with the owner. The peer\_context and owner\_context fields are only modifiable by the peer and owner, respectively, to store extra provider-specific information. ### fi\_ops\_srx\_owner::get\_msg() / get\_tag() These calls are invoked by the peer provider to obtain the receive buffer(s) where an incoming message should be placed. The peer provider will pass in the relevant fields to request a matching rx\_entry from the owner. If source addressing is required, the addr will be passed in; otherwise, the address will be set to FI\_ADDR\_NOTAVAIL. The msg\_size field indicates the received message size. This field may be needed by the owner when handling FI\_MULTI\_RECV or FI\_PEEK. The owner will set the peer\_entry-\>msg\_size field on get\_msg/tag() for the owner and peer to use later, if needed. This field will be set on both the expected and unexpected paths. The returned rx\_entry-\>iov returned from the owner refers to the full size of the posted receive passed to the peer. The peer provider is responsible for checking that an incoming message fits within the provided buffer space and generating truncation errors. The tag parameter is only used for tagged messages but must be set to 0 for the non-tagged cases. An fi\_peer\_rx\_entry is allocated by the owner, whether or not a match was found. If a match was found, the owner will return FI\_SUCCESS and the rx\_entry will be filled in with the known receive fields for the peer to process accordingly. This includes the information that was passed into the calls as well as the rx\_entry-\>flags with either FI\_MSG \| FI\_RECV (for get\_msg()) or FI\_TAGGED \| FI\_RECV (for get\_tag()). The peer provider is responsible for completing with any other flags, if needed. If no match was found, the owner will return -FI\_ENOENT; the rx\_entry will still be valid but will not match to an existing posted receive. When the peer gets FI\_ENOENT, it should allocate whatever resources it needs to process the message later (on start\_msg/tag) and set the rx\_entry-\>peer\_context appropriately, followed by a call to the owner’s queue\_msg/tag. The get and queue calls should be serialized. When the owner gets a matching receive for the queued unexpected message, it will call the peer’s start function to notify the peer of the updated rx\_entry (or the peer’s discard function if the message is to be discarded) ## fi\_ops\_srx\_owner::queue\_msg() / queue\_tag() Called by the peer to queue an incoming unexpected message to the srx. Once it gets queued by the peer, the owner is responsible for starting it once it gets matched to a receive buffer, or discard it if needed. ### fi\_ops\_srx\_owner::foreach\_unspec\_addr() Called by the peer when any addressing updates have occurred with the peer. This triggers the owner to iterate over any entries whose address is still unknown and call the inputed get\_addr function on each to retrieve updated address information. ## fi\_ops\_srx\_owner:: free\_entry() Called by the peer when it is completely done using an owner-allocated peer entry. ### fi\_ops\_srx\_peer::start\_msg() / start\_tag() These calls indicate that an asynchronous get\_msg() or get\_tag() has completed and a buffer is now available to receive the message. Control of the fi\_peer\_rx\_entry is returned to the peer provider and has been initialized for receiving the incoming message. ### fi\_ops\_srx\_peer::discard\_msg() / discard\_tag() Indicates that the message and data associated with the specified fi\_peer\_rx\_entry should be discarded. This often indicates that the application has canceled or discarded the receive operation. No completion should be generated by the peer provider for a discarded message. Control of the fi\_peer\_rx\_entry is returned to the peer provider. ### EXAMPLE PEER SRX SETUP The above description defines the generic mechanism for sharing SRXs between providers. This section outlines one possible implementation to demonstrate the use of the APIs. In the example, provider A uses provider B as a peer for data transfers targeting endpoints on the local node. - ``` 1. Provider A is configured to use provider B as a peer. This may be coded into provider A or set through an environment variable. 2. The application calls: fi_srx_context(domain_a, attr, &srx_a, app_context) 3. Provider A allocates srx_a and automatically configures it to be used as a peer srx. 4. Provider A takes these steps: allocate peer_srx and reference srx_a set peer_srx_context->srx = peer_srx set attr_b.flags |= FI_PEER fi_srx_context(domain_b, attr_b, &srx_b, peer_srx_context) 5. Provider B allocates an srx, but configures it such that all receive buffers are obtained from the peer_srx. The srx ops to post receives are set to enosys calls. 6. Provider B inserts its own callbacks into the peer_srx object. It creates a reference between the peer_srx object and its own srx. ``` ### EXAMPLE PEER SRX RECEIVE FLOW The following outlines shows simplified, example software flows for receive message handling using a peer SRX. The first flow demonstrates the case where a receive buffer is waiting when the message arrives. - ``` 1. Application calls fi_recv() / fi_trecv() on owner. 2. Owner queues the receive buffer. 3. A message is received by the peer provider. 4. The peer calls owner->get_msg() / get_tag(). 5. The owner removes the queued receive buffer and returns it to the peer. The get entry call will complete with FI_SUCCESS. 6. When the peer finishes processing the message and completes it on its own CQ, the peer will call free_entry to free the entry with the owner. ``` The second case below shows the flow when a message arrives before the application has posted the matching receive buffer. - ``` 1. A message is received by the peer provider. 2. The peer calls owner->get_msg() / get_tag(). If the incoming address is FI_ADDR_UNSPEC, the owner cannot match this message to a receive posted with FI_DIRECTED_RECV and can only match to receives posted with FI_ADDR_UNSPEC. 3. The owner fails to find a matching receive buffer. 4. The owner allocates a rx_entry with any known fields and returns -FI_ENOENT. 5. The peer allocates any resources needed to handle the asynchronous processing and sets peer_context accordingly, calling the owner's queue function when ready to queue the unexpected message from the peer. 6. The application calls fi_recv() / fi_trecv() on owner, posting the matching receive buffer. 7. The owner matches the receive with the queued message on the peer. Note that the owner cannot match a directed receive with an unexpected message whose address is unknown. 8. The owner removes the queued request, fills in the rest of the known fields and calls the peer->start_msg() / start_tag() function. 9. When the peer finishes processing the message and completes it on its own CQ, the peer will call free_entry to free the entry with the owner. ``` Whenever a peer’s addressing is updated (e.g. via fi\_av\_insert()), it needs to call the owner’s foreach\_unspec\_addr() call to trigger any necessary updating of unknown entries. The owner is expected to iterate over any necessary entries and call the inputed get\_addr() function on each one in order to get updated addressing information. Once the address is known, the owner can proceed to receive directed receives into those entries. ## fi\_export\_fid / fi\_import\_fid The fi\_export\_fid function is reserved for future use. The fi\_import\_fid call may be used to import a fabric object created and owned by the libfabric user. This allows upper level libraries or the application to override or define low-level libfabric behavior. Details on specific uses of fi\_import\_fid are outside the scope of this documentation. ## FI\_PEER\_TRANSFER Providers frequently send control messages to their remote counterparts as part of their wire protocol. For example, a provider may send an ACK message to guarantee reliable delivery of a message or to meet a requested completion semantic. When two or more providers are coordinating as peers, it can be more efficient if control messages for both peer providers go over the same transport. In some cases, such as when one of the peers is an offload provider, it may even be required. Peer transfers define the mechanism by which such communication occurs. Peer transfers enable one peer to send and receive data transfers over its associated peer. Providers that require this functionality indicate this by setting the FI\_PEER\_TRANSFER flag as a mode bit, i.e. fi\_info::mode. To use such a provider as a peer, the main, or owner, provider must setup peer transfers by opening a peer transfer endpoint and accepting transfers with this flag set. Setup of peer transfers involves the following data structures: - ``` struct fi_ops_transfer_peer { size_t size; ssize_t (*complete)(struct fid_ep *ep, struct fi_cq_tagged_entry *buf, fi_addr_t *src_addr); ssize_t (*comperr)(struct fid_ep *ep, struct fi_cq_err_entry *buf); }; struct fi_peer_transfer_context { size_t size; struct fi_info *info; struct fid_ep *ep; struct fi_ops_transfer_peer *peer_ops; }; ``` Peer transfer contexts form a virtual link between endpoints allocated on each of the peer providers. The setup of a peer transfer context occurs through the fi\_endpoint() API. The main provider calls fi\_endpoint() with the FI\_PEER\_TRANSFER mode bit set in the info parameter, and the context parameter must reference the struct fi\_peer\_transfer\_context defined above. The size field indicates the size of struct fi\_peer\_transfer\_context being passed to the peer. This is used for backward compatibility. The info field is optional. If given, it defines the attributes of the main provider’s objects. It may be used to report the capabilities and restrictions on peer transfers, such as whether memory registration is required, maximum message sizes, data and completion ordering semantics, and so forth. If the importing provider cannot meet these restrictions, it must fail the fi\_endpoint() call. The peer\_ops field contains callbacks from the main provider into the peer and is used to report the completion (success or failure) of peer initiated data transfers. The callback functions defined in struct fi\_ops\_transfer\_peer must be set by the peer provider before returning from the fi\_endpoint() call. Actions that the peer provider can take from within the completion callbacks are most unrestricted, and can include any of the following types of operations: initiation of additional data transfers, writing events to the owner’s CQ or EQ, and memory registration/deregistration. The owner must ensure that deadlock cannot occur prior to invoking the peer’s callback should the peer invoke any of these operations. Further, the owner must avoid recursive calls into the completion callbacks. ## RETURN VALUE Returns FI\_SUCCESS on success. On error, a negative value corresponding to fabric errno is returned. Fabric errno values are defined in rdma/fi\_errno.h. ## SEE ALSO [fi\_provider(7)](/fi_provider/7.md), [fi\_provider(3)](/fi_provider/3.md), [fi\_cq(3)](/fi_cq/3.md), ## AUTHORS OpenFabrics.